Talk:Slavery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Socialism is a form of modern slavery. It should be noted that all Masonic civilizations have practiced slavery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9460:5A40:290A:4AD7:7CEC:F640 (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Slavery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

NPOV[edit]

Slavery is depicted as bad throughout the article. As an author you have to be above the zeitgeist, even if the topic is considered morally questionable. Morality is always subjective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.47.74.232 (talk) 14:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Slavery in classical antiquity[edit]

the page is locked, otherwise I'd do it myself.

Can someone add the Slavery in antiquity article as a "main article" heading under the Slavery#Classical antiquity section. Thanks --Tomatoswoop (talk) 01:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

OK. Editor2020 (talk) 19:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Slavery is 'Slavs'[edit]

This is an extremely questionable and controversial theory to be removed. The fact is that it was invented by "scientists"-racists 17-18 from Germany and France. Unfortunately this misconception is so common still in the West, even in Oxford refer to it. In reality, the Slavs have absolutely nothing to do with slavery. Unfortunately, I cannot change this text now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frost210 (talkcontribs) 18:49, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 August 2018[edit]

Change "there are an estimated 45.8 million people subject to some form of modern slavery worldwide.[6]" to " there are an estimated 40.3 million people subject to some form of modern slavery worldwide.[6]" The information currently available on Wikipedia is outdated, although the source of the information is correct: https://www.globalslaveryindex.org/2018/findings/highlights/ 144.32.113.131 (talk) 11:00, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

 Done Sam Sailor 21:48, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 October 2018[edit]

A world map showing countries by prevalence of female trafficking, accompanied by an image has no credible source. it claims some countries e.g., India that female trafficking is partially legal, which is not the case. https://www.globalslaveryindex.org/2018/findings/highlights/ Referring to this article, India has one of the stronger enforcement for anti-slavery laws (although prevalent, problem is taken seriously). Further, referring to another Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_trafficking_in_India, it clearly states that trafficking is strictly illegal.

Whoever included the attached images, did not provide a

Map3.3Trafficking compressed.jpg

source. Sachk666 (talk) 08:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Not done The image is from 2011 and is a little outdated. You can update the image at File:Map3.3Trafficking_compressed.jpg. The image is from http://www.womanstats.orgBrandonXLF (t@lk) 23:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)