This article has like a number of issues to begin with. First of all, despite the citations given, I'd say that the [[WP:N|notability] is at least in doubt. First off, I'm not sure if publications by the authors of something can be said to be "independent" of the subject, even if presented at conferences. Second, I have my doubts that a few conference papers constitute "significant" coverage.
If notability is somehow established, it most likely needs something like a complete rewrite. At the moment it starts with a lead section that has no real content and the whole article is void of any concrete explanation of what this thing actually is, or what it may be good for. Averell (talk) 11:07, 17 November 2009 (UTC)