Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 36

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Someone misspelled "cartridge" in the first paragraph. --Boristhebulletdodger (talk) 22:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where did "Smith & Wesson is definitely not Ford Motor Company." come from? It's obviously a true statement, but it also seems very redundant in the article and somewhat inappropriate to the desired level of language. --79.202.196.58 (talk) 18:45, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

I think this article, along with Smith & Wesson Model 37, and Smith & Wesson Model 60 be merged into Smith & Wesson Chief's Special. Then, in that article we have sections for the 36 (all carbon frame), 37 (aluminum frame with carbon steel barrel and cylinder), 637 (aluminum frame with stainless steel barrel and cylinder), and 60 (all stainless frame). --Goldenbirdman (talk) 12:21, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In popular culture[edit]

I deleted the "Popular Culture" part since it has nothing to do with the gun itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarendas (talkcontribs) 08:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Headings like "Popular Culture" are common in Wikipedia. Admittedly, there is no logical connection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.72.219 (talk) 16:13, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Smith & Wesson Model 36. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]