This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
"Snoopy, Come Home" was the very first movie I saw in a theater. I was only five years old at the time. I enjoyed the comedy, but I was too young to understand much of the plot. I've seen it a few times since then, and it's a great movie for people who like "tear-jerkers." I don't like those kind of movies, though, so it's probably my least favorite Charlie Brown film.220.127.116.11 (talk) 16:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Two things stick out in my head from this movie since I last saw it many years ago, the song No Dogs Allowed and the one they sing when Snoopy is out in the streets. LReyome254 (talk) 03:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
After some of the headlines in the article List of minor characters in Peanuts have changed, some broken links in this article should be fixed (for example the names of Lila and "annoying girl"). Someone else must do it, because when I tried it three times, it was declared "vandalism" and my edit was reverted . I was finally adviced in my talk page to "discuss [my] changes on the appropriate talk page for the article before continuing to make edits" . --18.104.22.168 (talk) 17:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Before, Snoopy met Woodstock for the best friends like Laurel and Hardy for the happiness for many years ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlj1989 (talk • contribs) 05:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 11:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
The copyright registration has both comma and exclamation point. Also, if you're looking for a title source, the Lassie material is at best an indirect one; there was a Peanuts strip collection issued in 1963, Snoopy, Come Home (so comma, no !). The book adaptation of the film released at the time of the film was The "Snoopy, Come Home" Movie Book (again, comma, no !). I have a Peanuts COI not particularly relevant to this discussion. --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Lassie Come Home was submitted as the precursor of "Dog Come Home" titles. Having established that fact, each production is of course free to choose its own form, and if the on-screen title had indeed been Snoopy, Come Home, Snoopy Come Home! or Snoopy, Come Home!, I would have supported the use of such on-screen form as the main title header for the film's entry in Wikipedia. However, since the on-screen title is Snoopy Come Home, that form of the main header is the one I am supporting. Copyright entries, posters, publicity, VHS / DVD covers and other sources may differ in small details, thus leaving the on-screen credits as the uttermost authority.
In the introductions to the annual editions of his now-discontinued Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide, Maltin had written a variation on this sentence from the 1989 edition, "[T]rying to determine proper screenplay credit for Blithe Spirit, for example, we found three conflicting lists of coauthors in three equally authoritative books. Ultimately, and with the help of videotape, we turned to the film itself, and this remains our final arbiter for all screen credits". —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 07:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
The thing is, under Wikipedia article naming guidelines, we are not looking for the official name of the work, however one might define it, but for the WP:COMMONNAME. The official name (or various stylings thereof) makes fodder for the opening sentence, perhaps, but it is clear that beyond the on-screen usage, the film is generally refered to with comma in place. --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
By the way, this thread has now inspired a blog post which has some illustrations that may be of use to those researching the question. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:30, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Ultimately, those who agree with Maltin that the film itself "remains our final arbiter for all screen credits", especially in cases which lack unanimity among sources, are most likely to accept the no-comma form. Since a specialized nomination of this nature is usually applicable only to the matter at hand, we will have to wait for the emergence (or not) of a consensus.— —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 01:18, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Support per nom (we do tend to take on-screen title card as more authoritative in cases like this, but probably more to the point, it's going to usually result in WP:COMMONNAME, because it's always going to be the same, regardless what happens on various movie posters, VHS/DVD/BluRay box covers, etc. Support also per WP:CONCISE, and per the WP:MOS principle that an optional stylization of any kind should not be applied if it is not overwhelmingly dominant in the sources. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 09:57, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Found a pretty similar case: anime movie Your Anime isn't titled with with a '.' character, despite it being a sorta-official-but-not-really stylization used in some places. JAYFAX (talk) 21:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The opening sentence should start " Snoopy Come Home (often stylized with various punctuation marks) " to reflect the variety of naming we have found. We could even have a section listing the common title stylizations. I won't make the changes myself due to my conflicts of interest. --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC)