Talk:Social Democratic Party of America

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

2008 Social Democratic Party[edit]

David Schaich, unless you understand the party's history and the connection from that you have entered into opinion and like many times before personal attacks from the secular Socialist Party of the United States of America^TM. Until you can provide more than opinion the external link will stand.

Comraderedoctober (talk) 23:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, this article is about a political party that existed from 1898 to 1901. Any new political party you're involved with will need a different article, as it is a different organization. Social Democratic Party (United States, 2007) might work. As you write about your new political party, remember to be careful of potential conflicts of interest. Cheers, David Schaich ^Talk/_Cont 00:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I like the idea, the problem here on my end is under review as to what the SI has ruled. If they say we are "new" than all is well with starting a new article for Social Democratic Party (United States, 2007). If on the other hand their ruling is one of "continuation" than there will have to be a combined article.Comraderedoctober (talk) 11:28, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "continuation" would be with former SI member organization Social Democrats, USA, not with the Social Democratic Party, which dissolved decades before the current Socialist International was reconstituted, yes? -David Schaich ^Talk/_Cont 22:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not Stolen[edit]

Just a preemptive note that I am the author of the content here, which is adapted from my Early American Marxism website, mirrored by me to the GNU (hopefully got that acronym right) Marxists Internet Archive website. I didn't heist it from anyone, in other words.

Tim Davenport
EAM
Carrite (talk) 23:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]