Talk:Sound on Sound

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Magazines (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Updates[edit]

Can this article please have 'stub' status removed? Thanks in advance. SOSJennifer (talk) 15:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Thought I'd chuck in some facts from recent editions to give a little more background on the magazine. --DavidP 23:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no move per discussion below. There doesn't seem to be a clear consensus to make an exception to our usual house style in this case. If such a consensus develops in the future, then we can revisit this proposal. - GTBacchus(talk) 01:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)



Sound on SoundSound On SoundRelisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2010 (UTC) This is how the magazine styles itself, similar to Iphone v iPhone. OpenPaladin (talk) 13:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Support If a move like this is uncontroversial, just put a {{db-move}} on the redirect that you need to get out of the way and then move it yourself. ErikHaugen (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose Beg pardon, it does appear from guidelines such as WP:MOSTM that we should keep titles like this "correct" rather than how the magazine writes it. ErikHaugen (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment The magazine actually uses all caps "SOUND ON SOUND" - they just use a different colour for the initials. It is self evident from the picture in the article. Roger (talk) 09:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Support, plenty of references on the website and Facebook page using capitalized "On", seems perverse to do it differently unless we can show that third-party sources do it differently. (The wide use of the abbreviation "SOS" also speaks for the capitalized "O".)--Kotniski (talk) 13:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
    Consensus at WP:MOSTM seems to indicate that we should not, even if it might seem perverse. The exception to this rule are for things like iPhone and eBay, but apparently not for things like this. Please read that guideline and let me know if I'm reading it wrong. ErikHaugen (talk) 17:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
No, you're probably reading it right, except the bit at the top that says there will be occasional exceptions. I think if there's no usage at all for the current form of the title, while there is frequent usage of the proposed form, then it's a pretty good case for an exception to be made.--Kotniski (talk) 06:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose because the convention is to prefer WP:CAPS over the subject's own spelling preference. Jafeluv (talk) 08:27, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.