|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soviet Union article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|The Arbitration Committee has authorized uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on users who edit pages related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, including this article.|
Provided the awareness criteria are met, discretionary sanctions may be used against editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process.
|Soviet Union has been listed as a level-3 vital article in History. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as B-Class.|
|The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.|
|This page is not a forum for general discussion about Soviet Union. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Soviet Union at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk.|
|Soviet Union was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.|
|Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 8, 2004, and December 26, 2006.|
|Current status: Delisted good article|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Threads older than 3 month may be archived by .
Please add a section about sovietism - movement for the restoration of the Soviet Union. Sovietist is a member of this movement — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:700C:EB00:1CB9:D5BD:1905:35EF (talk) 00:40, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- There is a Wikipedia article, Neo-Sovietism, about that topic. Bruce leverett (talk) 01:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
There are (at least) three important things wrong with the new subsection:
- There are now two places in the article at which the legal treatment of homosexuality starting in the 1930's is described. Two is not better than one.
- The new subsection is part of the section, "Women and Fertility". Recall that the 1931 law did not make female homosexuality a crime, or even mention it. And homosexuality is not directly connected with fertility. So this is the last place to put a discussion of this topic -- no one would look for it there.
- The new subsection is copied word-for-word from another Wikipedia article, LGBT_history_in_Russia#LGBT_history_under_Stalin:_1933–1953, without attribution. I will ask you again to read the strictures about copying here: WP:COPYWITHIN. As editors, we cannot blithely ignore the Wikipedia licensing terms.
If you think you can improve on the treatment of this topic, I still encourage you. But it is necessary to use some common sense.
I was also taken aback by your edit summary, in which you characterized the readership as including "pro-Russian idiots" and "many dumb people". Wikipedia is not some wild online forum, in which we do battle with "dumb pro-Russian idiots". May I recommend that you read what's at this link: WP:BATTLEGROUND. Wikipedia is a place to which people come to learn, and sometimes, to teach. Both learning and teaching require an atmosphere of mutual respect. Bruce leverett (talk) 02:19, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- Bruce leverett I was going to get to this was at work they were a Sock to a Banned user pre BMB https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Bans_apply_to_all_editing,_good_or_bad
- A number of banned editors have used "good editing" (such as anti-vandalism edits) tactically, to try and game the banning system, "prove" they cannot be banned, or force editors into the paradox of either allowing banned editing or removing good content. Even if such editors only make good edits, they will be rebanned for evasion
Personal blogs are not reliable sources
This sentence: "Compared to countries with similar per-capita GDP in 1928, the Soviet Union experienced significant growth."
Is supported only by an archive of a now-deleted personal blog published in 2013. There's no indication of any editorial process, and the blog's writing is nakedly activist in tone and word choice. I'm not even sure the blogger's real name is available. This is not a reliable source by standard Wiki policy and this sentence should be removed, along with the source. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 03:28, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have taken the liberty of moving this section to the end of the talk page, which is the customary place to add new sections to talk pages.
- Your objections are noted. But the author claims to be roughly summarizing a book: Robert C. Allen’s Farm to Factory: A Reinterpretation of the Soviet Industrial Revolution. It would be reasonable to look through this book and try to make one's own summary, before removing the one that is there. Bruce leverett (talk) 03:50, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Congress of Soviets
User:Age20035, User:Akshay888777: It would be very useful and helpful if you would explain, on this talk page, your reasons for including Malenkov in the list of leaders, or your reasons for not including Malenkov. Also, don't be shy about discussing any other principles or rules you use for deciding what names and dates appear in this list, and in other lists. As you may be aware, this list has been modified several times, just in the last few months. It would be good to bring some order to this chaos. Thank you! Bruce leverett (talk) 02:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, the reason I added Gregory Malenkov to the “Leaders” section in the infobox is because, in case you didn’t know, he did count as a leader of the nation despite serving a short term. However, I accidentally didn’t put: “Gregory Malenkov: (de facto)”. Malenkov spent most of his term fighting for power with Nikita Khrushchev. Akshay888777 (talk) 16:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Akshay888777