This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mozilla, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mozilla and its products on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Agree: for the reason that the article JägerMonkey isn't very large. Nothing prevents a future split-away iff the JägerMonkey section becomes large later, but for now a separate article isn't needed. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 18:59, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Agree: and merged it --asqueella (talk) 19:32, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
C Programming Language backgrounds; Reference names
I wasn't sure how to incorporate this into the article as it just feels odd referencing a wiki with another wiki, but I wanted to make mention of how SpiderMonkey was originally written in C:
Also, there are two named references whose names don't refer to any previous citations. Might anyone know which citations "hunted" and "mozilla1" should refer to? Ender and Peter 00:57, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. wbm1058 (talk) 19:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Oppose. Lack of a space is inadequate differentiation. Why are some editors so keen to create avoidable ambiguity? --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 16:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
It’s not ambiguous. The monkey’s name doesn’t use camelcase. Gorobay (talk) 18:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Oppose as per above - Moving it to "SpiderMonkey" would IMHO only cause confusion to everyone especially those who are perhaps looking for Spider monkey. -Davey2010Talk 03:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)(Amended 29/2/16)
Support The as moving. --忍者ポップ (talk) 05:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Support. This is the only page with the name of SpiderMonkey, camel case or otherwise. The other title has redirected here for six years without any complaints. kennethaw88 • talk 01:33, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
You haven't provided a reason for supporting ....., If this doesn't get moved (and it shouldn't) then I'll personally take this to RFD, We can't have Spider Monkey and SpiderMonkey pointing to 2 different things and SpiderMonkey should never have been pointed to the software in the first place. –Davey2010Talk 15:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Support. It's hard to imagine anyone typing in or clicking on SpiderMonkey spelled and capitalized in that fashion looking for anything else. The base name already redirects here with no issue, so the parentheses serves no disambiguation purpose. Anyone hitting "SpiderMonkey" is coming here any way, we may as well remove some verbiage for them.--Cúchullaint/c 21:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Support - request seems fair enough per WP:SMALLDETAILS. As Cuchullain says, it's not likely that someone would type "SpiderMonkey" when looking for a spider monkey, and if they do, there's sure to be Old Mother Hatnote at the top of the article to help them along their way. — Amakuru (talk) 20:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Support. Any reader confusion can be handled by hatnotes. —seav (talk) 05:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Support, per nom and other comments. Hatnotes should suffice. -- Wikipedical (talk) 21:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.