Talk:Spillway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plughole Spillway[edit]

"These uncontrolled spillway devices are also called morning glory,[10] plughole,[citation needed] glory hole[10] or bell-mouth[11] spillways."

I have found evidence to support the satement that a Bell-mouth spillway is also called a Plughole spillway but don't know how to cite. If any helpful and knowledgable Wikipedian is able to do it, it sure would be appreciated.

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&rlz=1B3GGLL_en-GB___AU463&q=%22plughole+spillway%22&oq=%22plughole+spillway%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=104238l109819l0l111146l6l4l0l0l0l0l2122l2925l2-2.1.9-1l4l0 58.110.118.224 (talk) 11:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

=[edit]

Gibberish removed. Anyone else got any good spillway pictures? --18:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

There's good picture of a bellmouth spillway on the Ladybower reservoir page. 83.104.249.240 17:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the lead image[edit]

The current one does a poor job of reflecting the scale and impressive nature of that particular spillway, and spillways in general. I've just put one of the Kangaroo Creek Reservoir in flood that is a darn site more interesting and just as representative. Since User:Velela reverted my unilateral action on changing this I put it to you "spillway aficionados". Furthermore, on a "technical" note, the image is noisy, has multiple aberrations, and the focus could be better. It looks to scanned from an old print. Cheers -Oosh (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious about these aberrations ? Spherical, pin-cushion, chromatic ?? I don't see them myself but who am I to talk. Velela (talk) 18:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed erroneous reference to Bonneville Dam[edit]

I took "Bonneville Dam" out of the spillway cross-section picture in the "Types" section. The schematic shown has Tainter gates, but Bonneville Dam has vertical lift gates on its spillway. 140.194.140.21 (talk) 21:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC) CatCube[reply]

Many sources (including this image source) describe Bonneville Dam as having Tainter gates, probably in addition to the vertical lift gates it clearly does have. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what these sources are, but if they exist, they're factually incorrect. Bonneville Dam has no Tainter gates. 140.194.140.21 (talk) 17:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC) CatCube[reply]
I believe the cross-section image is the source of the incorrect information. The dam's spillway has sluice gates and there are tainter gates (valves) in the lock. See here as well.--NortyNort (Holla) 11:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Spillway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]