Talk:Spyder (software)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Articles for creation (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article was created via the article wizard and reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted on 8 April 2012 by reviewer Aaron Booth (talk · contribs).

Changes to second intro para[edit]

Changes I've made:

  • Updated winpython link.
  • Removed 'and integrated with' as it has no special integration with those OS.
  • Add dubious to lead sentence. I don't think Spyder is unique in these features. In any case, the very restrictive qualifier 'In comparison with other IDEs for scientific development'. What other specifically 'scientific development' Python IDEs are there? There are other cross-platform IDEs, open-source IDEs, IDEs written in Python, and IDEs available under non-copyleft license. I'll return in a while and remove if no discussion.
  • Python(x,y) is available for Ubuntu: [[1]]

peterl (talk) 06:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

I've removed the 'dubious/discuss' tag as there appears to not have been any discussion since this was done by Peter in March 2014. Since its been 2-1/2 years since Peter said he would "return in a while and remove if no discussion" I assume it must have just slipped off his 'to do' list ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spyder (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)