Talk:Square root of 3
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Square root of 3 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Removal of infobox
Based upon a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#"Infoboxes" on number articles, I've removed the infobox from the article. If anyone disagrees, could you please join the discussion there. Thanks, Paul August ☎ 14:56, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- I have suggested centralizing this discussion to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Irrational_numbers_infobox and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Infobox_with_various_expansions as it refers to an infobox occurring in several articles. Please go there to build consensus on this edit. RobHar (talk) 19:34, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Why can't it be 1.5?
Because 1.5 * 1.5 = 2.25. A simple way to calculate √3 (using continued fractions) is as follows:
1st estimate = 2/1 = 2
2nd = (4*2-1)/(4*1-0) = 7/4 = 1.750
3rd = (4*7-2)/(4*4-1) - 26/15 ≈ 1.7333
4th = (4*26-7)/(4*15-4) = 97/56 ≈ 1.73214
5th = (4*97-26)/(4*56-15) = 362/209 ≈ 1.732057
- I suggest we remove this talk entry entirely. The person was clearly making a joke and not asking a question.Tgm1024 (talk) 15:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
I know this isn't very scientific and all; and I'm not really a big fan of the movie, but shouldn't it be noted that there is a poem titled and "describing" the square root of 3 in the movie Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay? The text can be found here http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0481536/faq#.2.1.16 I know we can't include it verbatim, but isn't it relevant? 184.108.40.206 (talk) 01:53, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- It is common for Wikipedia articles to have a section at the end called "In popular culture". You could create that section with this item -- say "In the movie "..." such and such character [name him] reads [or composes and reads? or composes and the narrator reads?] a poem called "Root 3" [or whatever it's called], in which the square root of three is used as a metaphor for being kept 'out of sight'." Duoduoduo (talk) 14:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Use of in images
For any numbers m & n, (2m + 3n)2 - 3(m + 2n)2 = m2 - 3n2, so we get the following series of approximations for : 2/1, 7/4, 26/15, 97/56, 362/209, 1351/780, which gives rise to a method of constructing much more perfect 60° angles in images than the one in the article "Eisenstein prime" in the following image for an image that size. Blackbombchu (talk) 18:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
It is interesting to learn that "The traditional mnemonic device for remembering this rounded value is George Washington's year of birth, 1732.", but I don't think this "tradition" exists anywhere else than in North America. As far as I'm concerned, I'd rather remember it to be the year of birth of Beaumarchais and Fragonard... I don't know how this should be handled? Arthurprat (talk) 01:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)