From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Spaceflight (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


Surely you'd want to turn the maser on again when the probe is about 80% of the way to the star, so that the maser 'light' and the probe reach the star at the same time?

Csmiller 18:19, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Sounds right. The article currently only mentions turning the beam on again when the Starwisp "approaches" the target star, which isn't exactly in contradiction with this, but this will be a good detail to mention explicitly. :) Bryan 23:53, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Links to Other Wikipedia Articles[edit]

It is possibly best to link the article to beam-powered propulsion and to mention that higher velocities MIGHT be obtainable by hybridising the given propulsion concept with other types of propulsion.

I'm also inclined towards thinking that the technical problems section is a bit to pessimistic as to what is physically possible with starwisp, but if this section were referenced better, I would be more prepared to accept it's validity (interstellar Hydrogen becoming a radiation hazard and 'turning radioactive' sounds a little to far fetched to me, perhaps whoever stated this was referring to the velocity difference between starwisp and interstellar Hydrogen?). The issue concerning starwisps reflector bending and causing it to 'break'/'bent', etc... can be remedied via the use of adjusting reflectors (which change direction, and probably shape too).

The use of mathematics to describe how radiation pressure provides starwisp with its acceleration would probably repeat radiation pressure, but would be an interesting thing to do.

FINALLY, there is NO mention of nanotechnology - which is a shame, as this can improve the "size economics" of star wisp so that most of the mass of the probe would be the reflector.

ConcernedScientist 19:05, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

StarWISP Internet[edit]

I deleted the addition "StarWISP is a Texas company founded by Tommy Johnson in 2002 to provide wireless Internet service near Houston." This is probably true, but my quick search shows that their domain is parked, and redirects to a different wireless internet provider with no mention of StarWISP. So StarWISP, the Texas wireless internet provider, seems too minor to be worth discussion in an encyclopedia.

Needs additional sources[edit]

I've tagged the article because most of the content does not have sources. A lack of sourced material in this article is not a reason to add more. Dawnseeker2000 15:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Reference Breakthrough Starshot? Merge?[edit]

Considering that the "Breakthrough Starshot" proposal is basically "Starwisp", shouldn't there be a paragraph describing the connection and linking to that article on Wikipedia? Indeed, should this page be merged into Starshot? 2600:1000:B11C:E4B5:E17E:8927:427B:76AC (talk) 16:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

@2600:1000:B11C:E4B5:E17E:8927:427B:76AC: Imo there could at least be a see also to that page. I'm opposing a merge though. --Fixuture (talk) 22:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)