|WikiProject Physics / Relativity||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
Vandalism by 22.214.171.124
I had been monitoring this article for bad edits, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.
Possible factual problem
I'm not an expert, and I haven't checked the references yet. . . , but I suspect the mentioned in the first set-off equation is not to be identified with the defined in the next paragraph. Following through the definition seems to give a distinct result. Algonkian wanna learn (talk) 00:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Its not. The article uses the "well-known" convention that is three dimensional, while is four-dimensional. That is, i=1,2,3 and mu=1,2,3,4. I'm not sure where to say this; it is one of those things that "everyone knows". 126.96.36.199 (talk) 17:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Or are you trying to say that the definition of the twist vector is wrong? Its not just "mentioned", the first equation uses and the paragraphs that follow give it a name: the "twist vector" and define as that anti-symmetric derivative-product of the killing vector. Or maybe you are saying that metrics of that form can also include 's that are more general than just twist vectors? Hmm. Maybe. I don't know. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)