Talk:Stem cell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good articleStem cell was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 25, 2006Good article nomineeListed
March 7, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Added library resources template[edit]

Hi, since this is a popular topic for student essays, I added a library resources template. If it is disliked, it can be deleted. I won't be offended. Pangurban22 (talk) 19:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Page protection[edit]

I've requested pp. Jytdog (talk) 19:06, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Request edit on 19 November 2016[edit]

Hi,

To make the first section clearer id suggest:

Broadly, there are two types of stem cell. Tissue stem cells are found in various places of the body and enable growth, repair and renewal of tissues and organs. Embryonic stem cells are generated in the lab from cells of the early embryo (4-6 days old depending on the organism)

As it stands, it implys that embryonic stem cells are found in mammals, which they aren't; they are grown in the lab from cells of a mammal embryo. Using the definition of self renewal, stem cells aren't found in the early embryo - they dont self renew, just differentiate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Endoderm (talkcontribs) 13:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Stem cell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

It was a really interesting article, the stem cell I think is the great hope for people who suffer from common diseases such as diabetes. Something that blows my mind when I read that males have more adult stem cells in their bone marrow than female during their reproductive years. I also amazed by the huge number of the references. Rehab.Gharawi (talk) 04:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC) What about a theory that it`s all commercial scam (in a sense that certain people commercially exploit it promising a miracle) Necros2k7 (talk) 02:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)