Talk:Stephen Bolsin
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
NPOV[edit]
The page has many claims about Dr Bolsin's work, as well as lauding Dr Bolsin's work without relevant references at the appropriate sections. It appears that the article needs a complete overhaul. Ixistant (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
I have tried to tidy. He is an important figure of conscience.121.127.222.111 (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The article is now referenced appropriately. He's a controversial (and admirable) figure, but it's tone is neutral.NimbusWeb (talk) 09:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC)