|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to . If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.|
|WikiProject Biography||(Rated Stub-class)|
I am the owner of www.downes.ca
The material cited is from my website. On my website (and on that page, in fact) is a clearly displayed Creative Commons license allowing reuse of material from the site.
If there is any additional verification required, please take note, that this, or any of my other material, may be freely used by Wikipedia.
This raises an interesting issue i think. How does one qualify a blogger/thinker. Everyone in the edublogging community knows that stephen is central to online learning. how do i prove it... --Davecormier 03:30, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- I've added a very small number of his published work and will endeavour to find other materials to fit the A7 criteria. He really is a vital, everyone knows your name kinda guy in online education. --Davecormier 03:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Downes is a really big deal in the field, it's just a question of documenting that. Don't delete him! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 14:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Why would this be deleted? Stephen Downes is the father of Learning 2.0 http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mharrisonline (talk • contribs) 04:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- User:Widged added WP:PROD with
- concern = self-promotional as the page appears to have been created by user himself (as per comment on CC license in discussion. Persons against deletion are direct collaborators Downes-Cormier
- I do not feel this would be an uncontroversial deletion, so removed the notice. One could file a AfD. Note that discussion above is very old, edits have been made in past 5(!) years since. Unclear why anyone felt need to plea for non-deletion last September. Mike Linksvayer (talk) 21:59, 6 February 2011 (UTC)