This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Half of his dozen books have their own Wikipedia pages
What makes Steve Berry novels so popular? I would suggest the added value of historical content! The sentence in this article is well-spoken: "He and his wife, Elizabeth, have founded History Matters, a nonprofit organization dedicated to aiding the preservation of heritage." I am reading my first Steve Berry book, The King's Deception, and find it amazing! Having lived in London for a month, and having personal family history from the area, I am extra devotedly into learning all about the Tudors and their predecessors. It is more than an action thriller, although it is definitely not easy to stop reading.
I realize that this WP TALK page is for improving this article—since there wasn't a TALK page, I decided to start one! — Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 22:16, 26 November 2013 (UTC) My suggestion at this point is to encourage WP pages for the other best novels.
Please add references to secondary or tertiary sources
I would like to see the April 2007 tag removed that asks for more secondary sources. Can we work on this? The tag says, "Please add references to secondary or tertiary sources." — Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 18:33, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
^Cite error: The named reference randomhouse.com was invoked but never defined (see the help page).