Talk:Still (film)

Hi there, I would like to add a few positive reviews to the page (without removing the negative ones). Would be possible to lower the pages protection so that I may do this? Or could I send the reviews to an editor to them in please?

Blunt stuff (talk) 22:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding reviews to the STILL film page[edit]

The user below has a request that an edit be made to Still (film). That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest.
The requested edits backlog is moderate. Please be patient. There are currently 142 requests waiting for review.

Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

What I think should be changed:

Please add reviews to RECEPTION section:

1) “Utterly absorbing…totally engaging...Simon Blake asks hard questions and asks them beautifully. He is one to watch...” Daniel Woburn, Close-Up Film 4/5

2) "An impressively powerful piece of work, uncomfortable but utterly riveting." Freda Cooper, Talking Pictures 4/5

3) “STILL is one of the most assured pieces of filmmaking I’ve seen in quite some time......Keep an eye on this film maker as STILL promises great things ahead” Joel Wicklund, Chicagoist

4) “Still is a great film, hypnotic and compelling. This is a film I’d recommend to anyone looking for a drama with a tragic arc, and serious real stakes” Bernardo Villela, The Movie Rat 9/10

5) "One of the most surprising, gritty and impressive British films I've seen in a long time." Rob Aldam, Backseat Mafia

6) “Still is chiefly a gripping, exceptionally performed drama, anchored by a standout turn from Gillen” Eric Hills, The Movie Waffler 4/5

7) “It nails the uncertain atmosphere of a city in flux…Gillen is superb.” Wendy Ide, The Times 4/5

Why it should be changed:

This section is not reflective of all the critic responses recieved by the film. Please can you add the reviews attached.

References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

1) https://close-upfilm.co.uk/still-review

2) https://fredacooper.wordpress.com/tag/STILL/

3) https://chicagoist.com/2014/10/08/chicago_international_film_festival_4.php

4) https://themovierat.com/2015/06/23/review-still-2014/

5) https://www.backseatmafia.com/film-review-still/

6) http://www.themoviewaffler.com/2015/05/new-release-review-still.html

7) https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/still-n3hbkk2qvmd FifiO83 (talk) 08:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

The only source that would be considered reliable in that list is The Times. It's paywalled but can probably be accessed through The Wikipedia Library. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why the other sources are not considered reliable? They are all from critics who attended a screening of the film.

In the meantime could you please add the Times review as the first review on the Reception section. FifiO83 (talk) 10:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]