Talk:Storm tides of the North Sea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Globalization needed[edit]

This article seems to deal only with Europe, when storm tides do occur elsewhere in the world. --Coredesat 01:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand what the problem is, the article is dealing with storm tides in the North Sea, which is on the European continental shelf. How can it deal with global storm tides? --AJFurnell (talk) 12:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think the global article exists already at Storm surge with a further article at Extratropical storm surge. The North Sea is especially prone to storm surges due to its semi-enclosed nature and bathymetry (shallowing to the south) with certain coastal areas along the south and west margins of the sea having seen some significant disasters. The point of the article is to provide an area to document these storms, and the conditions which cause them. Of course these same conditions also affect nearby areas in Western Europe, notably the Atlantic coasts of France and Spain, Irish Sea, English Channel, Bristol Channel, Baltic Sea and Norwegian Sea, but usually to a lesser degree. The question I think is whether to add notable surges from these areas on this page (Towyn flood Irish Sea 1990, lothar/Martin surge France 1999), or expand it to cover all NW Europe?Lacunae (talk) 17:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article rename[edit]

I propose changing the article name to something along the lines of Storm surges of the North Sea as being a perhaps more modern wording, also to reflect that these events are the result of extratropical cyclones and basin topography rather than tides.Lacunae (talk) 17:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Storm tides of the North Sea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lede section[edit]

Your tag says the lede section needs to be re-written. But I don't think that a lede is necessary for this article. There is nothing to sum-up. Just listings. Valetude (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]