Talk:Structuralism (architecture)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Architecture  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

What is it?[edit]

This article leaves unaddressed what structuralism is, its principles, what it looks like. There's some history on the matter, but the most important thing remains unexplained. Kent Wang (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Nakagin Capsule Tower200810.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Nakagin Capsule Tower200810.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Nakagin Capsule Tower200810.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Problems with the article[edit]

I've tagged this article with a number of problems that should probably be addressed:

  1. "Housing Estates, Buildings and Projects" needs to be wikified.
  2. Bibliography should be at the end
    • Needs citations! There are a lot of sources, but they do not use the proper citation template. In other instances, there aren't any citations where there should be.
  3. The lead is a bit awkward and can do with a sprucing up.
  4. There are a lot of examples, especially of images. I like the variety, but there may be too many (but I'm not sure). They may look better once the article is cleaned up.
  5. There are a lot of images. Co-aligning them may help.

Yaminator talk 01:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Blackburn is not a real philosopher[edit]

He is only a professor of philosophy. Platon, Nietzsche were real philosophers! it's a huge difference. 93.219.144.39 (talk) 16:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Nakagin Capsule Towers[edit]

Version-1 or version-2 ?

Leuk2 17:00, 9 November 2014 (UTC)