To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: | B1 <!-- Referencing and citations --> = y/n | B2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy --> = y/n | B3 <!-- Structure --> = y/n | B4 <!-- Grammar and style --> = y/n | B5 <!-- Supporting materials --> = y/n
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
The title ought to be lowercase for the generic concept, caps for proper nouns/named sites. Tower, or tank, isn't the best word, unless it's known every facility is housed in a tower or a tank. XLerate (talk) 08:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Support - looks like a no-brainer to me. If there are no objections within the next 24 hours, I will move it. – ukexpat (talk) 18:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Comment – The article began as a specific facility (the SETT in Portsmouth), but as it has now been expanded to cover other facilities, sentence-case should be more appropriate for the current article title. As it happens, all the facilities are towers and tanks (unless someone can find one that isn't - if you'll pardon me reversing your logic). Nevertheless that shouldn't be a bar to renaming the article. --RexxS (talk) 23:16, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.