This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Yet that appears to be EXACTLY what did happen. The two entries have nearly identical opening paragraphs, with the exact same population figure (19,049 [South] Sudanese-born), and in general seem identical! Can someone familiar with the topic please look into this? I have put an identical comment on the talk page of the other entry. Shmuel A. Kam (talk) 13:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
I've just reverted a series of edits in which a new section on "Crime" was introduced (here). Given the lack of content about the Sudanese community in Australia in this brief article, it is WP:UNDUE as it characterises the community as being criminal. There are a multitude of gangs harking from various ethnic groups in Australia, but they are not featured in the articles on diasporic groups. Placing such emphasis on criminality with nothing but statistics does not provide any form of insight other than a WP:POVPUSH derogatory one. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
I strongly oppose including this section. It was nice of Iryna Harpy to gently explain the removal of what reads, at least to me, as clear racism. CityOfSilver 20:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)