|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Ishtar isn't Akkadian
I don't know if it was my mistake or whose, but Ishtar isn't akkadian. Besides in some parts being called Innin, and at times Nannaya, Inanna pretty much stayed as Inanna until the OldBabylonian period. For example, if you read Enheduana's hymns, they're to Inanna and not Ishtar. Inanna was merged with Ishtar later on. Abdishtar (talk) 17:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Enheduanna's hymns at ETCSL is one source: http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/etcsl.cgi?text=c.4.07*&charenc=j#
And in the Babylonian texts the name Ininn/Inanna is replaced by Ishtar, for example the babylonian hymns: http://books.google.com/books?id=IigBAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA160&dq=ishtar+raising+of+the+hand&lr=&as_brr=3&cd=1#v=onepage&q=ishtar%20raising%20of%20the%20hand&f=false
(often they were written in akkadian, but they themselves weren't akkadian, so I can see where the confusion comes in. Akkadian was used like Latin, as a language for literature, though Ishtar herself wasn't akkadian)
Please do not revert this page
Please do not revert this page without discussing it on this talk page first. The creation of this page was not an act of vandalism, but was rather discussed and affirmed on the Mesopotamian Mythology Talk Page. It is a step in the process of separating Mesopotamian mythology from an erroneously lumped-together article into sourced articles that depict each mythology accurately. see: Babylonian mythology, which has already been established for this purpose.
Sources and the Sumerians
Sumerology as an independent field of study is relatively young compared to Egyptology and Assyriology. Because of this, and the historical interrelationships between Assyrian, Babylonian, Akkadian and Sumerian mythologies, examination of sources is very important to determine which mythology a given source is referring to. Many sources refer to Babylonian, Akkadian or even Assyrian texts as Sumerian texts. It is important to note that sources older than the ninteen-forties might be void of any information related to the Sumerians even if they use the name "Sumerians" to describe their subject. Many sources, especially from the late 1800's and early 1900's, contain information now deemed inaccurate, biased or even racist.
No sources should be dismissed outright because of age or authorship; but as objective students of history we must give our sources careful scrutiny.
This outdated source seems to offer no actual textual support. The oldest societies tended to deify cosmic and terrestrial forces, not have vague supreme beings that were later "polluted" by polytheism.NJMauthor (talk) 21:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
On Ki being the goddess of the earth at Esagila
Is the "at the Esagila" temple part necessary? I mean, Ki in general is 'earth' in sumerian, and in all sumerian and in some akkadian texts, she is the goddess of earth, not just at Esagila. As for the citation being needed, I added a link to the sumerian language page (or at least I am as soon as I am done here). But couldn't we just get rid of the "at the Esagila" part? Abdishtar (talk) 22:48, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 17:04 27 January 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 22:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC).
File:Khashkhamer seal moon worship.jpg Nominated for Deletion
|An image used in this article, File:Khashkhamer seal moon worship.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
The Hittites included a Hurrian population but what is this about talking straight about the Hurrians... and then referring to Anu and Ea as 'Arabian' gods? Either a few words are mistyped or the whole thing should be thrown out... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:400:8000:7650:402A:29C2:89B5:42F3 (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)