Talk:Sumner station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 12:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   Narrow and Traffic streets? So just clarifying, those are the names of the streets? That's weird but okeydokey. Out of curiosity is Narrow street particularly narrow? :)

   Yes, they are the real names and quite accurate.

   Why does the redlink 'Red Apple' pipe to ' Red Apple Markets'? Should you remove the piping if that's the actual name of the chain of stores?

   Removed the red link, but I plan to put the article at "Red Apple Markets" eventually. The company is commonly referred to as "Red Apple", but that title is taken by other articles.

   "two bicycle racks" - can you give any indication of how many spaces for bikes there are on the rack? I only ask as you're very specific with parking spaces, and this detail consequently highlights the lack of detail regarding the racks

   Added capacities for the bike racks and lockers.

   "awarded to Lumpkin General Contractor" - you previously mention a firm was based in Tacoma. Can you let us know where this contractor is based or something relevant about them?

   Couldn't find any information on the contractor.

   "were moved to a new facilities" - grammar

   Fixed.

   "on city-owned" - I'm a little confused by this. Is this the equivalent of saying "land owned by the city"

   Added missing word.

   "adjacent to the station in downtown" - should the word "in" be here? I'm honestly not sure.

   Removed "in downtown".

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Looks really good. Placing on hold until minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 12:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

@Freikorp: I've addressed your points above. Thanks for the review. SounderBruce 20:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Passing. :) Freikorp (talk) 23:13, 13 May 2018 (UTC)