Talk:Sutta Pitaka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Religious texts (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a joint subproject of WikiProject Religion and WikiProject Books, and a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religious texts-related subjects. Please participate by editing this article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Buddhism (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 


Consistency: Sanscrit vs. Pali[edit]

The Tripitaka/Tipitaka article uses the Sanscrit spelling, but as of this page, the Pali spellings are used. Should these be kept consistent? I'm not familiar with usage of the Sanscrit spellings for the Tipitaka, but if others are, perhaps they can update them. -- Jketola 1 July 2005 19:09 (UTC)

We should use Pali when we're talking specifically about the Pali Canon and Sanskrit when we're combining material about different versions of the Scriptures. Peter jackson 10:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Numbering for Samyutta and Anguttara is inconsistent. Peter jackson 17:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I've deleted the material about other Sutra Pitakas, which doesn't belong here. I've started a separate article Sutra Pitaka, just a stub so far. Someone who knows how to do it might like to move the deleted material there, and perhaps correct the Japanglish as well. Peter jackson 16:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

A Chinese translation of the term is based on the following....[edit]

--222.64.216.226 (talk) 12:58, 4 December 2009 (UTC)