Talk:TV JOJ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Slovakia (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

TV Joj woefully failed[edit]

Statements like this need dealing with if readers aren't going to be left with the opinion that this article isn't written from a neutral point of view as required by policy. Adambro (talk) 18:51, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

deleting of diskussions :-([edit]

Slovak version of this page is bad. Any discussion is deleted.

Shame to wikipedia , as it it loosing its freedom ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.141.94.169 (talk) 22:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

A few points[edit]

It's worthy of pointing out, that TV JOJ is now the second largest television, beating STV. And I'd also like to tell that there will be HD versions of both JOJ and JOJ Plus this fall (according to JOJ's director). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.40.182.3 (talk) 23:53, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Am I on wikipedia?...[edit]

There's a couple bullcrap statements in this article about the ownership of the channel, someone please fix em'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.95.155.8 (talk) 10:09, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:26, 5 July 2013 (UTC)