Talk:T wave

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Physiology (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.
 
WikiProject Medicine / Cardiology (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Cardiology task force.
 

Untitled[edit]

Why is the T-wave positive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.191.203.8 (talk) 09:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review suggestions[edit]

I think the article's tone is neutral and is a good start. Maybe consider expanding the "Clinical Significance" section, and finding sources for all the bullet points (except 1 that is already cited). Also, do you know the significance of the chart at the bottom? Is that information helpful for anything aside from diagnostic value? [I changed one of the links that I saw was incorrectly linked to heart disease instead of specifically to coronary ischemia, which I found as I was reading through the article.] --Rorazi (talk) 13:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)