Talk:Tachyon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Physics (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

tachyon particles are created by the symmetry breaking of light[edit]

NAC: Speedy closing this RFC as not having to do with an issue about article content. This appears to be original research, and not even a question about article content. If there is a question about article content, rather than original research or speculation, state it as a question about article content. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

the symmetry breaking of light is itself observation, which is relevant to my previous post:

space-time dictated by the uncertainty principle generates the multiverse which is an "infinitely" evolving fractal feedback loop(every-thing is a re-source from the singularity) through the quanta of all our minds which are folds/symmetry-breaks of/in space-time. our minds are themselves tachyon particles simply because we can visualize potential future states before the light of that event occurs in reality, if you believe multiverse theory you can reasonably assume that future state manifests in a parallel universe even if not in your own, our mind is a fold of spacetime where the purely abstract mathematical truth of a wave meets reality in the form of consciousness. necessarily the mind is also a superposition or 'entangled' with the 'abstract' uncertainty|certainty of the 'real' past|future, always obeying the uncertainty principle of information. through the uncertainty principle your mind is semi-randomly phase transitioning/symmetry breaking a novel worldline through the multiverse, helping to generate infinite complexity. perfect randomness is itself perfect infinity.

The5thForce (talk) 09:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

please read: FyzixFighter, Im going to ask you to first dispute the content of my post so we can reach a consensus over whether it warrants being included on this talk page unimpeded, if you cannot offer a constructive dialogue I will request additional oversight from wiki administrators The5thForce (talk) 01:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
I have requested additional editor comments after user FyzixFighter has deemed my contribution 'off topic' or otherwise unworthy of this talk page which i strongly disagree with, please offer any relevant comments if you are an active editor of this article. The5thForce (talk) 03:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

@The5thForce: please note that article talk pages are for discussions about the article, not about the subject. You can propose additions to, changes to and removals of content from the article, but you can not discuss the subject here. See wp:Talk page guidelines. - DVdm (talk) 21:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

this section is both: an attempt to have the article improved by discussing the subject, specifically 'the symmetry breaking of light is itself observation' as demonstrated by the double-slit experiment when combined with the copenhagen interpretation, im proposing this article should acknowledge that any observer is itself fundamentally both a tachyon particle and a creator of tachyon particles(procreation), if observation is the symmetry break of light and if mass and energy are equal- observation is also the symmetry break of all other forms of energy regardless of how spatially compact(massive) the energy appears relative(relativity) to the observer. The5thForce (talk) 21:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
(Off-topic, copied to (User talk:The5thForce )
If you can produce wp:reliable sources (and in this case wp:secondary sources) for your suggestion, then please do so now. Otherwise whatever you say here is off-topic and will be treated as talk page abuse and disruption, or ultimately as vandalism. - DVdm (talk) 22:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
-207 references in total(i like reading, hopefully you do):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry_breaking#References
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment#References
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation#Notes_and_references
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle#Notes
what i am saying is not off-topic and if you remove it i will request mediation and then arbitration with or without a request for disciplinary action on your account. The5thForce (talk) 22:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Do not forget to read wp:CIRCULAR and wp:SYNTH and wp:NOR. - DVdm (talk) 22:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
http://robotics.cs.tamu.edu/dshell/cs689/papers/anderson72more_is_different.pdf
Feynman, Lectures on Physics 3:Quantum Mechanics p.1-1 "There is one lucky break, however— electrons behave just like light.".
Feynman, Richard P.; Robert B. Leighton; Matthew Sands (1965). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. 3. US: Addison-Wesley. pp. 1.1–1.8. ISBN 0201021188.
See: Davisson–Germer experiment "The diffraction of electrons by a crystal of nickel". BSTJ 7: 90–105. 1928.
https://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/physicists-smash-record-for-wave-particle-duality-462c39db8e7b
Eibenberger, Sandra; et al. (2013). "Matter-wave interference with particles selected from a molecular library with masses exceeding 10000 amu". Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 15: 14696–14700. arXiv:1310.8343. Bibcode:2013PCCP...1514696E. doi:10.1039/C3CP51500A.
https://books.google.com/books?id=-4sJ_fgyZJEC&pg=PA2&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false
---observation is the fundamental symmetry break necessitating that the observer is simultaneously a tachyon particle who both came from and creates other observers(other tachyonic particles), due to the uncertainty principle- an object moving faster than light fundamentally can only be reduced to a break in the symmetry of that light- the observation itself. The5thForce (talk) 22:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

───────────────── Ok, so propose a precise and concrete addition of content here, with the exact sources to support it, so the other contributors can verify the lot, and discuss whether it is wp:DUE here. But before you do, have a close look at wp:SYNTH. - DVdm (talk) 22:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Does light can.[edit]

A tachyonic antitelephone is a hypothetical device in theoretical physics that could be used to send signals into one's own past........


    Q#So if this could  be real ,can light can be used to send signals to past¿How...... Saaroj Rawal (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
That is an incorrect and failed interpretation of the theory of relativity and shows the problem of interpreting the results of math blindly. Timetravel is also impossible by default because you cannot travel to something that does not exist yet/any more. If you read Einstein you would note that he does not speak of timetravel but of "in the eye of the beholder", as in, something travelling FTL might APPEAR to mess with time from the point of view of a watcher, but it does NOT actually do so. DW75 (talk) 17:42, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Is really 'Tachyon' something?[edit]

As 98% people say light is faster but 2% say Tachyon is faster + IS REALLY TACHYON THERE IN OUR UNIVERSE?

I

Is the 98% right or Is the 2% right? Asy113 (talk) 03:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Tachyon is faster by definition; the question is whether it exists or not. Wikipedia cannot answer that question, but see second sentence in the article. -- Dr Greg  talk  18:07, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tachyon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

17 and 28 GeV neutrinos are tachyons[edit]

See Neutrino. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Are you talking about the Faster-than-light neutrino anomaly? --FyzixFighter (talk) 19:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)