Talk:Take It Back

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mother Earth?[edit]

According to whom? Render unto me a fucking break. Ifnkovhg (talk) 04:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to put in my two cents that interpretations be removed from the articles regarding songs on The Division Bell and more citations of David Gilmours comments regarding the songs be added. There are numerous sources in which Gilmour basically states that he refuses to say what the songs are about. Anything that is not a direct quote is pure speculation and may actually hinder the ability of the reader/listener to form his or her own unique ideas about the music, which is exactly what the band seems to prefer - leaving the songs open to interpretation. --Chinagreenelvis (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pale U2 Imitation[edit]

I wouldn't say this song sounds especially like "Where The Streets Have No Name" in particular, but to my ears, it was obvious from the start that Gilmour was deliberately trying to sound like The Edge, in hopes of having a hit. This is ironic, considering that The Edge was probably influenced by Gilmour's earlier work with digital delay and palm-muting on The Wall (1980). But The Edge took it in his own direction, so when Gilmour turns up in 1994 with this riff, he's is the one who sounds imitative. Bizarre, but there you have it.
Just one of the many little ways in which this song suuucks . . . .
--63.25.244.89 (talk) 16:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not Pink Floyd's fault that every U2 song sounds the same. This makes it almost inevitable that ONE of their songs would sound like ONE U2 song. But I digress...this page is meant for academic discussion of the article...--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 22:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was also coming to ask whether any critic had ever observed that this song is Pink Floyd trying to sound like U2. —Mahāgaja · talk 10:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

What makes this article start class when it seems to resemble a stub?--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 02:34, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Take It Back. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]