"Global warming ceased to be a subject of scientific debate years ago. Watch how critics jump straight to an examination of motives or credentials rather than the substance of an author’s argument whenever books like this one are published."
This is ridiculous on its face. There's been a consensus among scientists for two decades. Questing global warming is like questioning the holocaust or the existence of the moon. While the author seems to wish people would repeat the vast knowledge that has been built up on the subject every time somebody questions an established fact out of ignorance. Should we cast doubt on the universal theory of gravitation because "it has ceased to be a subject of scientific debate years ago?"
Asinine spam like this is exposing Wikipedia to ridicule: