Talk:Tamil–Kannada languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject India / Karnataka / Tamil Nadu (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (marked as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (marked as High-importance).
 
Note icon
This article was last assessed in April 2012.
WikiProject Languages (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of standardized, informative and easy-to-use resources about languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Why Should the river dispute be discussed on this page? Chirags 05:48, 4 September 2005 (UTC)


Ganapti: I do not understand why you have wholesale reverted my edits which were adding clarity to the article. The article was labeled as citing no authority and I have added a good deal of relevant citations from Dravidian linguistics. Please restritc your edits to specific statements. Thank you. Periannan Chandrasekaran 14:37, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

The origin of Kannada and Telugu scripts are discussed in detail in Talk:Telugu script and currently under dispute. I request you to participate in that discussion and not to make any changes to any article discussing the issue till the dispute is resolved. Once the matter reaches a consensus, we'll change accordingly in all articles. Note that Bh.Krishnamurthi is not the only scholar and there are number of other scholars who express opposite opinions. We have to be careful not to give WP:UNDUE to one scholar's stance. Gnanapiti 17:18, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Gnapti: Thanks for trying to edit specific portions. No coming to the Scripts section, if you wish to give importance to other scholars it is gladly welcome and you please simply add their statements too here to give multiple learned opinions on the subject. But you please do not erase all scholarly citations so as to simply let only your unsupported opinion remain. So again if you have other supporting *scholarly* claims please add them here. Moreover if you think there is another place which is serving as the main place for Telugu script origin, then please do not have anything on it here at all especially it is not a published scholarly claim. So either you remove yours completely or let other statements be here or let us simply make the section point to Telugu Script article. I will do that right now. As any way scripts are very irrelevant and then we will have to talk about the scripts of other members of the Tamil-Kannada branch also: Tamil, Malayalam and so on Periannan Chandrasekaran 18:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)