Talk:Thaat

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thaat article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Music Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian music workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Well Done[edit]

I have to commend the writers / editors of this page - good job with showing the Western modal aspects with respect to thaat. Gautam ^Discuss 01:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you clarify difference between western mode & raga[edit]

Your concept of thaat is a musical mode in Hindustani music which always has seven notes is correct or "Indian ragas can be regarded as modes."(quote from a famous URL) is correct. Which one is correct because incorrect information in respective URL'S shows limited knoledge on Indian Culture or it will be taken as an attack on our Great Indian Culture.

akarshanbohidar@gmail.com ^Discuss

That Colon[edit]

What comes after it?! All this talk about attacking the 'Great Indian Culture' is rather funny too. No one's trying to hurt your culture mate. (Y) 86.162.151.136 (talk) 23:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

?? Gingermint (talk) 00:50, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Error in musical diagram[edit]

The third line of the diagram is labelled Bhairav, but should be Bhairavi since it shows E♭. Apologies for not correcting it - I don't have software to let me do this. --Stfg (talk) 10:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another correction in the attached diagram: For the Kãfi thãt, Dha should be mentioned as normal Dha, not as Dha:b. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dperiwal (talk • contribs) 05:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the error in Musical Diagram Scale[edit]

The third scale diagram and sixth scale diagram show the similar type of notes.

Assuming the sixth scale diagram "Bhairavi" thaat notes are correct, then third scale diagram "Bhairav" thaat requires correction. The notes Ga and Ni are not flat (komal) notes but are natural (shuddh) notes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.161.63 (talk) 14:14, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

difference in staff notation in relation to indian music terminology[edit]

Dear Active members what i observed is that the staff notation for bhairav notation compared to indian music which is described below(carnatic music - Maya malawa gowla raagam) has shown wrong i think. If I am right then please consent otherwise leave a comment for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkkameshwar (talk • contribs) 13:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mode vs. Scale vs. Scale type[edit]

@Intellectualrunoff: Could you please look into finding and comparing reliable sources on the western equivalent/definition for thaat? I've seen sources equate them to modes. Others equate them to "scale types" or "parent scales" rather than just "scales". I believe "parent scales" (much like melas) are the most apt. Thanks.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 09:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cpt.a.haddock: "Parent scale" does appear to be widely used.

Oooo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.68.195.29 (talk) 06:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]