Talk:The Big Move rapid transit projects

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Transport Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GO Transit Regional Express Rail (split)[edit]

I would like to split the section GO Transit Regional Express Rail to a separate article. The section is getting rather long for an article that is essentially a project summary. I could call the new article GO Transit Regional Express Rail (the current section name) or GO Regional Express Rail, a redirect pointing to the section used by other articles to link to the topic. Are there any comments? Which of the 2 suggested names is preferred? @Ground Zero: @Natural RX: @Radagast: @Secondarywaltz: TheTrolleyPole (talk) 19:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Since this will be operated by GO Transit, or will simply be an increase of their existing services, I think the choice is obvious. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. --Natural R_X 21:09, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just for clarification, may I interpret the above comments to mean that I may split the section to a new article named: GO Transit Regional Express Rail? TheTrolleyPole (talk) 21:27, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just for clarification, you may also dance naked at centre ice, but you're probably not that bold. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, BE BOLD! We've got you covered. Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. TheTrolleyPole (talk) 23:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be fair?[edit]

If the plan was published in 2008, then a 15 year timeline would be 2023 ... can I add that to the table? Could we evaluate how many of the projects are underway? I'd like to add a column to the tab for statusFeldercarb (talk) 02:34, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think this would be a good addition. Something along the lines of the Twenty-eight by '28 page would fit IMO. Sbb618 (talk) 08:36, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regional vs Express Rail[edit]

What's the diff? In the table, we have "regional" and "express" as separate items. In the text below, we have "regional express". Confusing. Could we link to something that would explain itFeldercarb (talk) 02:28, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]