This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Editors may wish to reconsider what appear to be original research assumptions about ambiguity in the Themes section. James is not explicit... "partially due to the conventions of the time" is iffy, considering ambiguity is the hallmark of all James novels. It has nothing to do with the conventions of the time, and it is questionable that anyone familiar with his work would say that, so that sounds like pure OR. "But this vagueness may actually enrich the novel because it creates possible ambiguity about Olive's motives" goes on to make it clear that while the article author does understand the literary function of the ambiguity in this particular novel, they are not aware that it is James style and not unique to the novel. It would be much better IMO to quote and cite recognized James scholars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 18:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)