Talk:The Boxer (The Chemical Brothers song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Fair use rationale for Image:Theboxer.chemicalbrothers.single.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Theboxer.chemicalbrothers.single.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Boxer (The Chemical Brothers song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  17:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "It charted in Spain, Ireland and the US Dance Singles Sales chart" - It charted in Spain, Ireland and in the US Dance Singles Sales chart
    " was donated to Good for Nothing's 50/50 Make or Break in 2011" - it might be best to mention that Good for Nothing are a charity group here
    "It also had a one-week stay on the Spanish Albums Chart at number 17 in the week of July 31 and at number 15 on the Billboard's US " - already linked twice
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Good work. I couldn't find anything worthy enough to put this on hold, so I'll pass it now as it meets the criteria. JAGUAR  12:52, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

@Jaguar: Thank you so so much for reviewing my article. I wish you all the best. Beyoncetan (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)