This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
the 'main ideas' found in the book is found (i.e. repeated) too in the entry on HLA hart. Chensiyuan 08:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
I removed the reference to Saint Lazare who is an entirely unimportant and unrecognizable name in the field. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 08:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
This book is humorous. Because morality and law should never be separated. Essentially this book is an ironic essay on how the law itself demonstrates to be criminally incompetent. Separating morality from law is also grounds for dictatorship. Gosh, the 1960's were very bad. Yes, I know this is not a forum. Deal with it. Please don't erase this because you feel it is within your right. You are not helping. ....SandwitchHawk.... (talk) 05:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)