Talk:The Continence of Scipio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move the page to The Continence of Scipio, per the discussion below and the titles of a preponderance of the works involved. Dekimasuよ! 07:04, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


AlluciusContinence of Scipio – If he actually existed, which is questionable, Allucius is only known as a figure in this story, which is a common subject in art and the main subject here. He is not even the main or second main figure, but the Roman sources don't record the name of his future wife. Johnbod (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC) The Continence of Scipio is also possible. Johnbod (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support this article is about the story and related commentary on the story, not the person -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 22:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]