Talk:The Food Defect Action Levels

Food and drink: Foodservice High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as High-importance).

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

blatant vandalism[edit]

According to a comment (to an answer) on Quora, -- see https://www.quora.com/In-a-Kosher-diet-a-grape-the-fruit-itself-can-only-be-eaten-whole-If-you-were-to-cut-it-in-half-can-you-still-eat-it/answer/Beth-Goldowitz/comment/34564021 e.g. -- this edit: ("as of" 13:45, 1 May 2014

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Food_Defect_Action_Levels&diff=prev&oldid=606679955

was blatant vandalism (or at least, an egregious error) because the information is WAY off base, and is not contained in the source "linked to" from the footnote.

I myself am *** very *** unfamiliar with the customs (if any) of -- and the reasons (if any) for! -- inserting blatant vandalism into this article ... and unfamiliar with the customs for dealing with blatant vandalism (if any) in this article.

Hence, I will wait for someone else to comment about why it took so long for this to be detected ... and "whether" or not there are any reasons why one should not "immediately" revert the BOGUS edit mentioned above (see the URL "blockquote"d above for the DIFF listing, of that edit).

Any comments? --Mike Schwartz (talk) 08:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]