This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Holocaust denial is among the list of allegations. For historic reasons, this book cannot have referred to what most people would think of as the Holocaust. If there are no reasons against it, I'd suggest deleting this passage. Johannes Hüsing (talk) 10:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
In what sense? I've mentioned it in the lead paragraph now and there is the big box on the right.--Peter cohen (talk) 13:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
I see your improvement - of the lead. But I don't understand your question. This text is also universally acknowledge to be anti-Semitic in every sense of the word. If you want a referece, see Warrant for Genocide by Norman Cohn, p. 190. He only uses the word racist there. But it's clearly obvious, and from other sorces I don't have at the moment, that this work is antisemitic in every sense. So I think the "lede" should have that. I think racist applies to any race disparaged. But antisemitism is reserved explicitly against Jews. And this work singles out Jews more that any other race. So please include this categorization in the lede. --Ludvikus (talk) 14:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I've changed things further. I'm surprised you aren't being WP:Bold and doing things yourself. You have edited the article before. As to my question, I didn't understand your previous one.--Peter cohen (talk) 15:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Why don't you visit my Talk pages - it would explain to you why I now must now be a "WP:Mouse" instead. Also, you probably could make some good contributions to historical revisionism related articles. But I don't know if you - yourself - could be WP:Bold there! I've made this observation here because of the common link - antisemitism. Do you know what I mean? --Ludvikus (talk) 16:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)