Talk:The Gender War

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Documentary / Nordic

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.

Useless article[edit]

So there was an "inquiry," there was a "controversy," the documentary's "main argument" was questioned...

WHAT did this documentary allege? WHAT is the essence of the controversy about it? WHAT was Rubar accused of doing wrong? Without this information the article is a lot of talking around a conspicuously missing point. Predestiprestidigitation (talk) 11:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcasting commission report[edit]

The current section title "Found to be biased by the Swedish Broadcasting Commission" is too sweeping, inaccurate and editorialist - I'm changing it to a more simple one. According to Dagens Nyheter [1]: "Könskriget var opartisk, men brast i ett avseende i förhållandet till kravet på saklighet" - the film was neutral (opartisk) but was lacking in one respect to the requirement of objectivity (saklighet). It's a bit confusing becuase one can think neutrality and objectivity are the same thing. But that was rather minor criticism - the newspaper news title is that they "were freed". The second commission report of bias is merely about the two women who didn't make their final statements to the show - not about the whole document. --Pudeo ' 17:01, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]