Talk:The George Hotel, Crawley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article The George Hotel, Crawley has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
July 12, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 27, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the George Hotel (pictured) in Crawley, Sussex, has hosted Lord Nelson, a stranded Queen Victoria, illegal bare-knuckle prizefighters, horse auctions, the Acid Bath Murderer and public executions?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The George Hotel, Crawley/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 14:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

I shall review. TAP 14:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Initial Comments
  • The lead is meant to summarise the article, per MOS:LEADCITE and MOS:LEAD. In the article I see no reference of "Ramada Crawley Gatwick". I did not see the "or earlier" or "16th century" bit in the article body. Per that, include in body. I don't mind "Crawley's most celebrated building", as it is a quote.

Mentioned Ramada Crawley Gatwick in the facilities section. Will expand lead later.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

  • "At the time of the Domesday survey in 1086, no manor or village of Crawley existed,[5] but the thickly forested area was gradually being cleared and settled" — please reword this, so the "no manor or village of Crawley" is easier to read.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

TAP 19:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)