Talk:The Operative: No One Lives Forever/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs) 18:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Started reviewing the article. First of all I must say, this one is has a layout much perfect I've ever seen in other games. Will review and comment back if found any problems. ASHUIND 18:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment


  • There is still a clean-up tag regarding the plot if the article, please consider improving the plot section. ASHUIND 19:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Hello, thanks for doing the review. I tried making the more plot more concise. It is now 3528 character less then it was. Do you think the clean-up tag can be removed now? --Mondotta (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
      • Yes you can remove the plot tag now. It balances with the other section. ASHUIND 18:51, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
        • Plot tag removed. --Mondotta (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


  • See if you can find an image for soundtrack, so that you can put in the soundtrack info box into music section. ASHUIND 18:56, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
    • I've decided against an infobox for the album for the following reasons:
  1. It would add a bit of clutter to the page.
  2. It doesn't really have its own album cover.
  3. The infobox wouldn't give a lot of extra information (its release date is the same as the game's, its length is noted in the track listings, there is no available information about its producer or label, etc.)
--Mondotta (talk) 23:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Your second track is overlapping with the track list, consider moving it in section above.ASHUIND 18:56, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Final Analysis[edit]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Not much concerns here. ASHUIND 06:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references. ASHUIND 06:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    All such aspects have been covered. ASHUIND 06:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Fine here.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHUIND 06:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
  7. Overall:

Keep up the good quality of Article. Don't let it delisted.
ASHUIND 06:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)