Talk:The Post-Modern Prometheus/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SuperMarioMan 03:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The prose is fine. Minor problems with regard to the Manual of Style are resolved.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Citations are at hand if necessary, and are of high quality. No original research is apparent.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The article is detailed in its treatment of production, interpretation and reception aspects, without wandering from its subject.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    A neutral tone is maintained throughout, with citations to quotations and avoidance of original research.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Certainly stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    One non-free image, with a suitable fair-use rationale, which greatly aids the reader with identification of the article's subject.
  7. Overall:

This initial edit is just to open the review. I will submit comments in due course, probably later today, after a thorough reading of the subject article. SuperMarioMan 03:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

All things considered, I will pass the article straight off. I have made a number of edits to the page to amend text for MoS compliance (small inconsistencies between BE and AE spelling, "Dr"/"Dr." and other abbreviations, etc.) and to clarify some points in the lead (for example, to contextualise the subject), but these issues were quite trivial to begin with. The article is stable and avoids POV, while the non-free image presents no problems. It certainly appears to match the standards of other GA-class X-Files articles, such as "Sleepless". Congratulations for all your hard and worthwhile work! SuperMarioMan 19:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)