Talk:Timber Creek, Northern Territory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Australia / Northern Territory (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Timber Creek, Northern Territory is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory.
 
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for other than editorial assistance.

DYK nomination[edit]

I've nominated this article to be featured in the "Did you know" feature on the main page. The nomination is below. --Orlady (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2012 (UTC)


Removal of Subheadings[edit]

I thank Leptus Froggi for your recent edits, however I argue that the removal of the subheadings makes the article more confusing to read and navigate, for example the climate information now falls under the subheading "Griffiths Decision", and although it is a separate paragraph, this relates to completely different subject matter. I would like a consensus on reverting the edit, as when I originally created this article, I based the subheading structure on consistency with other articles about small towns in the Northern Territory (see Adelaide River, Northern Territory). Furthermore the article was peer reviewed as B class and edited several times for formatting and consistency when featured as a DYK, however I would like to know what other Wikipedians think about this. Dfadden (talk) 07:51, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

I agree with Dfadden that the removal of some headings diminished the quality of the article. I've restored some headings so that the table of contents once again allows readers to navigate the article topics. It would be worthwhile to discuss the article organization -- including whether these headings are the right ones, but dislike for certain headings is not a good reason to put clearly unrelated topics together under one of the remaining headings. --Orlady (talk) 12:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)