Talk:Time for Outrage!

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal[edit]

I proposed this merger, but am now thinking I acted too hastily. The NYT has a recent article about this booklet and it does appear to be worthy of its own article. Marrante (talk) 20:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I support separate articles: on the one hand, the booklet is not just any old essay to be included in his bibliography, but a surprise best-seller; on the other hand, shorter, more concrete articles are easier on the eye when reading digital content, and full advantage should be taken of wikilinks. Consensus of two? --Technopat (talk) 12:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The book has spawned a whole protest movement in Spain.--Bob Mudford (talk) 17:17, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's clear from the continually added new language versions and no support shown here for a merge, that the booklet is indeed worthy of its own page and the consensus here is to keep the articles separate. Therefore, I'm going to remove the merge flag from the article. Marrante (talk) 07:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]