Talk:Timothy Hunter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Similarities to Harry Potter[edit]

Many people have noticed similarities between Timothy Hunter — a bespectacled English teenager with family troubles who has a magical owl as a pet — and the later and more famous Harry Potter of J.K. Rowling's novels. Gaiman has been quoted as saying[citation needed] that any similarities between the two are largely superficial and most likely reflect the fact that both draw on common archetypes.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Hunter"

See: http://www.holycow.com/dreaming/archives/arc2-1998.html - and the entry for March 19, 1998 for Neil's discussion of the similarity between Harry and Tim.

157.128.83.162 03:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the same cite needed, see also http://www.januarymagazine.com/profiles/gaiman.html Claudia 18:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would remove the sentence "Most significantly, the original miniseries was published long before the Harry Potter books, the first of which was published in 1997." for this reason: JK Rowling originally got the idea for Harry Potter in 1990, the year Tim Hunter first appeared in print. I agree with Gaiman that similarities are largely superficial, yet the fact Tim Hunter may well have been an influence at least. I have no knowledge of Rowling denying it. My point is that saying "most significantly" and "long before" is not relevant because of the date coincidence. --84.100.17.73 21:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Illustrations[edit]

Comparison of the characters as written aside, I thought there had been mention of the similarity in illustration from the cover of the first Harry Potter book. I don't know where it would be, but I thought something was written up about it at the time. On the face of it, the article does a good write up about plaigerism of the character as written/general description, particularly Gaiman's response, but similarity of the illustrations is an entirely different matter. IMHO (talk) 20:53, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can't say it's something I've ever seen discussed, but surely if you've got two teenaged boys with dark hair and glasses their pictures are going to look quite similar. If we've got sources, it could be mentioned as an aside but I don't think the article needs any suggestion that the one character is based on the other in any way: there's just no evidence for it. JonStrines (talk) 09:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appearance in Hellblazer: Staring at the Wall[edit]

Ok, I would be confused. A character called Tim Hunter appears in this collection, and refers to himself as 'The Merlin'. I assumed that this guy is the same character, but in the Hellblazer comic, he appears to die. I sort of have a *huge* question mark about this. Can any sort this out for me? Ninjoc 10:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I remember this. He was only supposed to be knocked unconscious. Try www.insanerantings.com/hell/index1.html, I -think- that is where I found the info. That webpage's layout confuses me most terribly. Lots42 08:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't die he's just possessed by the Thing That Adam Didn't Name like the rest of the human race barring John and a few friends. RecentlyAnon 21:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion[edit]

I just read every Book of Magic series ever published. Does anyone have a problem with a major expansion of the fictional history. Cause damn, there is nothing there. RecentlyAnon 23:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. PLEASE. Lots42 05:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've expanded the character history as much as I can: I don't have copies of Hunter: The Age of Magic so I can't say what happened to Tim past Names of Magic. Anyone care to help? JonStrines (talk) 12:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TheBooksOfMagic ongoingseries 1.jpg[edit]

Image:TheBooksOfMagic ongoingseries 1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scars[edit]

I've reverted an edit to add back in a statement that Tim Hunter has a scarred forehead: he doesn't, and none of the articles discussing the similarities that are cited make this mistake either. The similarity is just down to the age, the magic and the owl. JonStrines (talk) 08:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tag at Fictional character biography[edit]

Excessively detailed and overlong fictopgraphies that violate Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction) have been deprecated in WikiProject Comics; one of the several discussions about this appears at Talk:Fictional history of Spider-Man. Please see the model used at Spider-Man, Superman and Batman. This FCB needs to be markedly trimmed, with third-party sourcing and a real-world context added. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Timothy Hunter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]