This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This actress' work lacks historical significance and the page should be removed.Paradise coyote (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC).
Unfortunately, that is not how these are considered. Apparently, she has won enough awards to merit an article. Though, if not more info can be found, I doubt this could stay. Or is it really okay to only tell she is an former actress and list her awards? Sarah Young on the other hand would have more than enough "historical significance", but she has no (American) awards, so no article. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 04:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)