- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 12:34, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Title of honor → Title of honour – Please see consensus of the article honour on Wikipedia. Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per
MOS:RETAIN; this article was written in American English and there is no reason to change it to British. Pppery 14:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- MOS:RETAIN does not apply to article titles. The relevant policy is WP:TITLEVAR, which is very clear on this matter. It says that varieties of English in article titles should not be changed across the encylopaedia have an artificial consistency. I.e., having color gel and colour state is acceptable and sensible. Therefore, I must oppose this proposal. RGloucester — ☎ 16:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose – This looks like unnecessary MOS:ENGVAR churning. I also don't see what "consensus of the article honour on Wikipedia" the nominator is referring to. Is this saying there was a move from honor to honour, or just that the honour article uses internally consistent spelling? —BarrelProof (talk) 04:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.