Jump to content

Talk:Tokimeki Memorial (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anime

[edit]

Where's the anime section ? I can't see it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.28.164.205 (talk) 01:34, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source

[edit]

Sales

[edit]

... "Tokimeki Memorial," a role-playing love-story simulation game that was first introduced in 1995. In the game, the player attempts to win the heart of a schoolgirl (tokimeki means "heartbeat") by choosing from among several phrases to ask her for a date. Often described as a game for nerds, it was an instant hit and sold 530,000 copies.
— Tanikawa, Miki (May 18, 2002). "BRIEFCASE: Gamers turn into investors". International Herald Tribune.

... the standard-setter has been Konami's Tokimeki Memorial, which came out in 1994 and has sold 1.1 million copies.
— Pollack, Andrew (November 25, 1996). "Japan's Newest Young Heartthrobs Are Sexy, Talented and Virtual". The New York Times.

So which is it? 530k by 2002 or 1.1M by 1996? (not watching, please {{ping}}) czar 01:49, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 December 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 00:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


– Per WP:VG naming guidelines, the series should be primary here. There are an absolute ton of games in it as well as other media. It's rare that a video game is primary over the series and I don't think the original Tokimeki Memorial rises to that level. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Video games has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink ( ) 17:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sources

[edit]