Talk:Trapper Peak (Canada)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Canada: British Columbia / Alberta / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Alberta may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Map[edit]

This map points up one of the fallacies involved in using jurisdictional maps for geographic features; geographic features are defined by geographic maps of geographic features; and when something is located on the boundary, a bi-jurisdictional map is needed, as here; some other pages, i.e. of BC-Alberta peaks, have BC maps, and both are wrong; there should be a Map of the Canadian Rockies, maybe a satellite or a graphic rendering, for such peaks; with provincial boundaries but not limited to one province/state; I don't have a pushpin one handy - nobody seems to have the time to make an ortho-rectilinear or whatever the type of projection map is that pushpins work on, i.e. for geographic/topographic features....guess I'll take this to WP:Maps, but all these should be addressed; ditto those on the BC-Alaska/Alaska-YT boundary....Skookum1 (talk) 20:57, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide a more concise summary of what the problem is? This is listed for RfC, but I don't really see what we are supposed to be commenting on? DigitalC (talk) 05:01, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]